Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35709808›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Planetary health2022

Extreme events and gender-based violence: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Kim Robin van Daalen, Sarah Savić Kallesøe, Fiona Davey, Sara Dada, Laura Jung, Lucy Singh, Rita Issa, Christina Alma Emilian, Isla Kuhn, Ines Keygnaert and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hot Weather and Violence Against Women: A Global Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kim Robin van DaalenCardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: k.r.vandaalen@gmail.com.
Sarah Savić KallesøeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Fiona DaveyHealth Equity Network, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sara DadaUCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Laura JungMedical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Lucy SinghLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rita IssaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Christina Alma EmilianDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Isla KuhnMedical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ines KeygnaertInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maria NilssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/12/2/29428British Heart Foundation RG/13/13/30194British Heart Foundation RG/18/13/33946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensity and frequency of extreme weather and climate events are expected to increase due to anthropogenic climate change. This systematic review explores extreme events and their effect on gender-based violence (GBV) experienced by women, girls, and sexual and gender minorities. We searched ten databases until February, 2022. Grey literature was searched using the websites of key organisations working on GBV and Google. Quantitative studies were described narratively, whereas qualitative studies underwent thematic analysis. We identified 26 381 manuscripts. 41 studies were included exploring several types of extreme events (ie, storms, floods, droughts, heatwaves, and wildfires) and GBV (eg, sexual violence and harassment, physical violence, witch killing, early or forced marriage, and emotional violence). Studies were predominantly cross-sectional. Although most qualitative studies were of reasonable quality, most quantitative studies were of poor quality. Only one study included sexual and gender minorities. Most studies showed an increase in one or several GBV forms during or after extreme events, often related to economic instability, food insecurity, mental stress, disrupted infrastructure, increased exposure to men, tradition, and exacerbated gender inequality. These findings could have important implications for sexual-transformative and gender-transformative interventions, policies, and implementation. High-quality evidence from large, ethnographically diverse cohorts is essential to explore the effects and driving factors of GBV during and after extreme events.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleViolence

Identifiers

PMID35709808
PMCPMC10073035

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.