Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710122›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Membership on the Use and Value of Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI.

M Mossa-Basha, C Zhu, C Yuan, L Saba, D A Saloner, M Edjlali, N V Stence, D M Mandell, J M Romero, Y Qiao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inter-rater reliability of atherosclerotic plaque enhancement on 7 T vessel wall MRI: Comparison with quantitative analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The effect of aspirin on aneurysm wall enhancement: A study in rabbits and humans.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease and neurodegeneration: a narrative review and plausible mechanisms.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Vessel Wall Imaging in Cryptogenic Stroke.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M Mossa-BashaFrom the Department of Radiology (M.M.-B.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina mmossab@med.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-8158
C ZhuDepartment of Radiology (M.M.-B., C.Z.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-549X
C YuanDepartment of Radiology (C.Y.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-5106
L SabaUniversity of Cagliari (L.S.), Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-3771
D A SalonerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.A.S.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-8547
M EdjlaliDepartment of Radiology (M.E.), AP-HP, Laboratoire d'imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale (BioMaps), Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4239-0831
N V StenceDepartment of Radiology (N.V.S.), Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-2710-7073
D M MandellJoint Department of Medical Imaging (D.M.M., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-4947
J M RomeroDepartment of Radiology (J.M.R.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-5749-3000
Y QiaoDepartment of Radiology (Y.Q., B.A.W.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0499-9283
D J MikulisJoint Department of Medical Imaging (D.M.M., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-0892
B A WassermanDepartment of Radiology (Y.Q., B.A.W.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8458-1778

Funding

3D WALLI: MR intracranial vessel wall imaging for stroke preventionR01NS092207 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOSSA-BASHA, MAHMUD, YUAN, CHUN · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIntracranial vessel wall MR imaging is an emerging technique for intracranial vasculopathy assessment. Our aim was to investigate intracranial vessel wall MR imaging use by the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) members at their home institutions, including indications and barriers to implementation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group survey on vessel wall MR imaging use, frequency, applications, MR imaging systems and field strength used, protocol development approaches, vendor engagement, reasons for not using vessel wall MR imaging, ordering-provider interest, and impact on clinical care, was distributed to the ASNR membership between April 2 and August 30, 2019.

resultsThere were 532 responses; 79 were excluded due to nonresponse and 42 due to redundant institutional responses, leaving 411 responses. Fifty-two percent indicated that their institution performs vessel wall MR imaging, with 71.5% performed at least 1-2 times/month, most frequently on 3T MR imaging, and 87.7% using 3D sequences. Protocols most commonly included were T1-weighted pre- and postcontrast and TOF-MRA; 60.6% had limited contributions from vendors or were still in protocol development. Vasculopathy differentiation (94.4%), cryptogenic stroke (41.3%), aneurysm (38.0%), and atherosclerosis (37.6%) evaluation were the most common indications. For those not performing vessel wall MR imaging, interpretation (53.1%) or technical (46.4%) expertise, knowledge of applications (50.5%), or limitations of clinician (56.7%) or radiologist (49.0%) interest were the most common reasons. If technical/expertise obstacles were overcome, 56.4% of those not performing vessel wall MR imaging indicated that they would perform it. Ordering providers most frequently inquiring about vessel wall MR imaging were from stroke neurology (56.5%) and neurosurgery (25.1%), while 34.3% indicated that no providers had inquired.

conclusionsMore than 50% of neuroradiology groups use vessel wall MR imaging for intracranial vasculopathy characterization and differentiation, emphasizing the need for additional technical and educational support, especially as clinical vessel wall MR imaging implementation continues to grow.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular DisordersIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35710122
PMCPMC9262066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.