Evidence mapPaperPMID 35712474Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Jing-Yu Benjamin Tan, Jianxia Zhai, Tao Wang, Hong-Juan Zhou, Isabella Zhao, Xian-Liang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of music-based interventions on cancer-related pain, fatigue, and distress: an overview of systematic reviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Cognitive impairments associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing-Yu Benjamin TanCharles Darwin University, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Casuarina, NT, Australia.
Jianxia ZhaiCharles Darwin University, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne Hub, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tao WangCharles Darwin University, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Brisbane Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Hong-Juan ZhouFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Nursing, Minhou, China.
Isabella ZhaoCharles Darwin University, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Brisbane Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Xian-Liang LiuCharles Darwin University, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Brisbane Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors are available. However, given the limitations in guideline development methodologies and inconsistent recommendations, it remains uncertain how best to design and implement non-pharmacological strategies to tailor interventions for breast cancer survivors with varied health conditions, healthcare needs, and preferences. Aim: To critically appraise and summarise available non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management and health promotion that can be self-managed by breast cancer survivors based on the recommendations of the CPGs. Methods: CPGs, which were published between January 2016 and September 2021 and described non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors, were systematically searched in six electronic databases, nine relevant guideline databases, and five cancer care society websites. The quality of the included CPGs was assessed by four evaluators using The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, second edition tool. Content analysis was conducted to synthesise the characteristics of the non-pharmacological interventions recommended by the included CPGs, such as the intervention's form, duration and frequency, level of evidence, grade of recommendation, and source of evidence. Results: A total of 14 CPGs were included. Among which, only five were appraised as high quality. The "range and purpose" domain had the highest standardized percentage (84.61%), while the domain of "applicability" had the lowest (51.04%). Five CPGs were rated "recommended", seven were "recommended with modifications", and the other two were rated "not recommended". The content analysis findings summarised some commonly recommended self-managed non-pharmacological interventions in the 14 guidelines, including physical activity/exercise, meditation, hypnosis, yoga, music therapy, stress management, relaxation, massage and acupressure. Physical activity/exercise was the most frequently recommended approach to managing psychological and physical symptoms by the included guidelines. However, significant variations in the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were identified among the included CPGs. Conclusion: Recommendations for the self-managed non-pharmacological interventions were varied and limited among the 14 CPGs, and some were based on medium- and low-quality evidence. More rigorous methods are required to develop high-quality CPGs to guide clinicians in offering high-quality and tailored breast cancer survivorship care.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinical practice guidelinescontent analysisnon-pharmacological interventionsself-management

Identifiers

PMID35712474
PMCPMC9195587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.