ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2022
Accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii Test in Assessing Severe Sarcopenia in Older Adults in Nursing Homes.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the Ishii Test for screening sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- The accuracy of screening tools for sarcopenia in older Chinese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing sarcopenia screening in primary care: a machine learning approach using simple physical tests vs. SARC-F in 2,788 community-dwelling older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Addressing Unmet Healthcare Needs in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The predictive values of sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative elderly patients with colorectal cancer: applying the diagnostic criteria of EWGSOP2 and AWGS2019.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- A sarcopenia prediction model based on the calf maximum muscle circumference measured by ultrasound.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Nomogram to screen older adult patients attending the radiology department for sarcopenia.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- The knowledge level and influencing factors of sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of SARC-F-EBM, Ishii test, and six other screening tools for sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cut-off points of the Ishii test to diagnosing severe sarcopenia among multi-ethnic middle-aged to older adults: results from the West China Health and Aging Trend study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to assess the comparative accuracy of using SARC-F, as well as the SARC-F in tandem with calf circumference (SARC-CalF) and Ishii test, to screen severe sarcopenia in older adults residing in nursing homes.
methodIn this cross-sectional study, the AWGS2019 criteria were used as diagnostic standards. We adopted an "exclusion" screening test, focusing on sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) combined with AUC, to assess the accuracy of the screening tools.
resultsWe studied 199 people aged 60 and older, of whom 67 (33.7%) had severe sarcopenia, including 40 males (41.2%) and 27 females (26.5%). Among all participants, the sensitivities and NPV of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii test were 85.1%/0.88, 68.7%/0.82, and 89.6%/0.94, respectively. For males, the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii test sensitivities and NPV were 77.5%/0.78, 47.5%/0.7, and 85%/0.88, respectively. Among females, the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii test sensitivities and NPV were 74.1%/0.9, 81.5%/0.92, 96.3%/0.99, respectively. There were no statistical differences between the AUCs of SARC-F or SARC-CalF for all participants or for the male or female groups; however, in terms of the AUC, the Ishii test was superior compared with the other two screening methods.
conclusionThe Ishii test is more suitable for screening severe sarcopenia in older adults in nursing homes compared to SARC-F and SARC-CalF, and 130 points are recommended as the cut-off value of the Ishii test for screening severe sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.