SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2022
Cardiovascular risk communication strategies in primary prevention. A systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Nurses' experiences with cardiovascular risk communication and lifestyle counselling during preventive dialogues in primary care: a qualitative interview study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Article
- From Misperception to Prevention: Improving Cardiovascular Health and Risk Perception Through Risk Communication in Hungary.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Process of Developing an Intervention to Increase Awareness of Cardiovascular Risk for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Co-Creation Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Evaluation after delayed and repeated intervention in the VIPVIZA-extended randomized controlled trial: beneficial results 6 years after baseline.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychological and socio-contextual factors influencing preventive healthcare decision-making: evidence from IT and ITES companies in three cities of India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of eHealth-based cardiovascular disease risk communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A Proposed Framework to Aid Primary Care Clinicians in Promoting Cardiovascular Health.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Time matters: exploring horizons in cardiovascular disease risk assessment.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- The Path for Men from Young Adulthood Results of Cognitive Tests to Subclinical Atherosclerosis at Age 60: The Mediating Role of Socioeconomic Status, Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors-Results from a VIPVIZA Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Patient-physician communication of health and risk information in the management of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a systematic scoping review.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Lifetime Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Disease: The Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- AI-driven tools for the prediction of obesity-related vascular diseases: stakeholder perspectives and challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Role of Visualization in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- From risk communication about asymptomatic atherosclerosis to cognitive and emotional reactions and lifestyle modification.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Guideline-Based Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Delivered by an mHealth App: Development Study.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of cardiovascular risk communication strategies to improve understanding and promote risk factor modification.
designSystematic review with narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive database search for quantitative and qualitative studies was conducted in five databases, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied health Literature (CINAHL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) and Web of Science. The searches were conducted between 1980 and July 2019. REVIEW
methodsThe systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane review methods. Data were extracted and a narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative results was undertaken.
resultsThe abstracts of 16,613 articles were assessed and 210 underwent in-depth review, with 31 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. We observed significant heterogeneity across study designs and outcomes. Nine communication strategies were identified including numerical formats, graphical formats, qualitative information, infographics, avatars, game interactions, timeframes, genetic risk scores and cardiovascular imaging. Strategies that used cardiovascular imaging had the biggest impact on health behaviour change and risk factor modification. Improvements were seen in diet, exercise, smoking, risk scores, cholesterol and intentions to take preventive medication.
conclusionA wide range of cardiovascular risk communication strategies has been evaluated, with those that employ personalized and visual evidence of current cardiovascular health status more likely to promote action to reduce risk. IMPACT: Future risk communication strategies should incorporate methods to provide individuals with evidence of their current cardiovascular health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.