Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720291›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Haematopoiesis in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio).

Michał Stosik, Beata Tokarz-Deptuła, Wiesław Deptuła

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Versatile CRISPR-Cas Tools for Gene Regulation in Zebrafish via an Enhanced Q Binary System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Function and Regulation of celsr1a in Skeletal Age-associated Homeostasis and Repair in Zebrafish.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michał StosikInstitute of Biological Science, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Beata Tokarz-DeptułaInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Wiesław DeptułaInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLUniversity of Szczecin · PLUniversity of Zielona Góra · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haematopoiesis in fish and mammals is a complex process, and many aspects regarding its model and the differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) still remain enigmatic despite advanced studies. The effects of microenvironmental factors or HSCs niche and signalling pathways on haematopoiesis are also unclear. This review presents

Indexed as

HematopoiesisZebrafishAnimalsCell DifferentiationHematopoietic Stem CellsMammalsDanio rerio (zebrafish)embryonic period haematopoiesishaematopoietic nicheshaematopoietic stem cellspost-embryonic haematopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID35720291
PMCPMC9201100
OpenAlexW4282000806

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.