Evidence mapPaperPMID 35725017Full record

Trial reportBMJ open diabetes research & care2022

Uptake of guideline-recommended postpartum diabetes screening among diverse women with gestational diabetes: associations with patient factors in an integrated health system in USA.

Susan D Brown, Monique M Hedderson, Yeyi Zhu, Ai-Lin Tsai, Juanran Feng, Charles P Quesenberry, Assiamira Ferrara

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Nursing Intervention on Children with Type 2 Diabetes.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Receipt of postpartum diabetes screening after gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, 2016-2022.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan D BrownDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA sdmbrown@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3920-0945
Monique M HeddersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Yeyi ZhuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Ai-Lin TsaiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Juanran FengDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Charles P QuesenberryDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Assiamira FerraraDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · 2025 to 2025
$700k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019367NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK120807NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK113325NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK067334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical guidelines urge timely postpartum screening for diabetes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), yet patient factors associated with screening uptake remain unclear. We aimed to identify patient factors associated with completed postpartum diabetes screening (2-hour oral glucose tolerance test within 4-12 weeks postpartum), as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWithin the context of Gestational Diabetes' Effects on Moms (GEM), a pragmatic cluster randomized trial (2011-2012), we examined survey and electronic health record data to assess clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with uptake of ADA-recommended postpartum screening. Participants included 1642 women (76% racial/ethnic minorities) identified with GDM according to the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in a health system that deploys population-level strategies to promote screening. To contextualize these analyses, screening rates derived from the GEM trial were compared with those in the health system overall using registry data from a concurrent 10-year period (2007-2016, n=21 974).

resultsOverall 52% (n=857) completed recommended postpartum screening in the analytic sample, comparable to 45.7% (n=10 040) in the registry. Screening in the analytic sample was less likely among women at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, assessed using items from an ADA risk test (vs non-elevated; adjusted rate ratio (aRR)=0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.98)); perinatal depression (0.88 (0.79 to 0.98)); preterm delivery (0.84 (0.72 to 0.98)); parity ≥2 children (vs 0; 0.80 (0.69 to 0.93)); or less than college education (0.79 (0.72 to 0.86)). Screening was more likely among Chinese Americans (vs White; 1.31 (1.15 to 1.49)); women who attended a routine postpartum visit (5.28 (2.99 to 9.32)); or women who recalled receiving healthcare provider advice about screening (1.31 (1.03 to 1.67)).

conclusionsGuideline-recommended postpartum diabetes screening varied by patient clinical and sociodemographic factors. Findings have implications for developing future strategies to improve postpartum care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ChildFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, NewbornPostpartum PeriodPregnancygestational diabetes mellitushealth servicesscreeningtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35725017
PMCPMC9214412
OpenAlexW4283165865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.