Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731452›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2023

Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model Predicting the Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Nifekalant During the First Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.

Youzheng Dong, Zhenyu Zhai, Bo Zhu, Shucai Xiao, Yang Chen, Anxue Hou, Pengtao Zou, Zirong Xia, Jianhua Yu, Juxiang Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youzheng Dong *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Zhenyu Zhai *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Bo Zhu *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Shucai XiaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Anxue HouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Pengtao ZouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Zirong XiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China. zirong_xia@163.com.
Jianhua YuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China. jianhuayu01@163.com.
Juxiang LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China. juxiang__li@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-4531
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to establish and assess a prediction model for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with nifekalant during the first radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

methodsIn this study, 244 patients with persistent AF from January 17, 2017 to December 14, 2017, formed the derivation cohort, and 205 patients with persistent AF from December 15, 2017 to October 28, 2018, constituted the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for variable screening and the multivariable Cox survival model for nomogram development. The accuracy and discriminative capability of this predictive model were assessed according to discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration. Clinical practical value was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

resultsBody mass index, AF duration, sex, left atrial diameter, and the different responses after nifekalant administration were identified as AF recurrence-associated factors, all of which were selected for the nomogram. In the development and validation cohorts, the AUC for predicting 1-year AF-free survival was 0.863 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.801-0.926) and 0.855 (95% CI 0.782-0.929), respectively. The calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual AF-free survival and the nomogram prediction in the derivation and validation cohorts. In both groups, the prognostic score enabled stratifying the patients into different AF recurrence risk groups.

conclusionsThis predictive nomogram can serve as a quantitative tool for estimating the 1-year AF recurrence risk for patients with persistent AF treated with nifekalant during the first RFCA.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationHumansPrognosisPyrimidinonesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomenifekalantPyrimidinonesAtrial fibrillationNifekalantNomogramPrognostic modelRadiofrequency catheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID35731452
PMCPMC10721663
OpenAlexW4283318379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.