Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731556›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Finding Primary Care-Repurposing Physician Registration Data to Generate a Regionally Accurate List of Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of an Open-Source Algorithm.

Ian R Cooper, Cameron Lindsay, Keaton Fraser, Tiffany T Hill, Andrew Siu, Sarah Fletcher, Jan Klimas, Michee-Ana Hamilton, Amanda D Frazer, Elka Humphrys and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ian R CooperInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-8369
Cameron LindsayInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-6805
Keaton FraserInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-1537
Tiffany T HillInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5718-7353
Andrew SiuInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1904-0948
Sarah FletcherInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-3772
Jan KlimasInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-0052
Michee-Ana HamiltonInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-216X
Amanda D FrazerInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-8271
Elka HumphrysInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-0157
Kira KoepkeInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-6138
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-1324
Morgan PriceInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-1579
Rita K McCrackenInnovation Support Unit, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-0364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome Canadians have limited access to longitudinal primary care, despite its known advantages for population health. Current initiatives to transform primary care aim to increase access to team-based primary care clinics. However, many regions lack a reliable method to enumerate clinics, limiting estimates of clinical capacity and ongoing access gaps. A region-based complete clinic list is needed to effectively describe clinic characteristics and to compare primary care outcomes at the clinic level.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to show how publicly available data sources, including the provincial physician license registry, can be used to generate a verifiable, region-wide list of primary care clinics in British Columbia, Canada, using a process named the Clinic List Algorithm (CLA).

methodsThe CLA has 10 steps: (1) collect data sets, (2) develop clinic inclusion and exclusion criteria, (3) process data sets, (4) consolidate data sets, (5) transform from list of physicians to initial list of clinics, (6) add additional metadata, (7) create working lists, (8) verify working lists, (9) consolidate working lists, and (10) adjust processing steps based on learnings.

resultsThe College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia Registry contained 13,726 physicians, at 2915 unique addresses, 6942 (50.58%) of whom were family physicians (FPs) licensed to practice in British Columbia. The CLA identified 1239 addresses where primary care was delivered by 4262 (61.39%) FPs. Of the included addresses, 84.50% (n=1047) were in urban locations, and there was a median of 2 (IQR 2-4, range 1-23) FPs at each unique address.

conclusionsThe CLA provides a region-wide description of primary care clinics that improves on simple counts of primary care providers or self-report lists. It identifies the number and location of primary care clinics and excludes primary care providers who are likely not providing community-based primary care. Such information may be useful for estimates of capacity of primary care, as well as for policy planning and research in regions engaged in primary care evaluation or transformation.

Indexed as

algorithmscomputing methodologieshealth services accessibilityphysicians’ officesphysicians, primary carepractice patterns, physiciansprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35731556
PMCPMC9496812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.