Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733121›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2022

Exploring the digital footprint of depression: a PRISMA systematic literature review of the empirical evidence.

Daniel Zarate, Vasileios Stavropoulos, Michelle Ball, Gabriel de Sena Collier, Nicholas C Jacobson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Systematic Review of Location Data for Depression Prediction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel ZarateInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Daniel.zarate@live.vu.edu.au.
Vasileios StavropoulosInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle BallInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Gabriel de Sena CollierInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicholas C JacobsonCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.
Victoria University · AUDartmouth College · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis PRISMA systematic literature review examined the use of digital data collection methods (including ecological momentary assessment [EMA], experience sampling method [ESM], digital biomarkers, passive sensing, mobile sensing, ambulatory assessment, and time-series analysis), emphasizing on digital phenotyping (DP) to study depression. DP is defined as the use of digital data to profile health information objectively.

aimsFour distinct yet interrelated goals underpin this study: (a) to identify empirical research examining the use of DP to study depression; (b) to describe the different methods and technology employed; (c) to integrate the evidence regarding the efficacy of digital data in the examination, diagnosis, and monitoring of depression and (d) to clarify DP definitions and digital mental health records terminology.

resultsOverall, 118 studies were assessed as eligible. Considering the terms employed, "EMA", "ESM", and "DP" were the most predominant. A variety of DP data sources were reported, including voice, language, keyboard typing kinematics, mobile phone calls and texts, geocoded activity, actigraphy sensor-related recordings (i.e., steps, sleep, circadian rhythm), and self-reported apps' information. Reviewed studies employed subjectively and objectively recorded digital data in combination with interviews and psychometric scales.

conclusionsFindings suggest links between a person's digital records and depression. Future research recommendations include (a) deriving consensus regarding the DP definition and (b) expanding the literature to consider a person's broader contextual and developmental circumstances in relation to their digital data/records.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneText MessagingDepressionEcological Momentary AssessmentHumansSelf ReportAmbulatory assessmentDepressionDigital phenotypeEcological momentary assessmentExperience samplingPassive sensingPRISMASystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID35733121
PMCPMC9214685
OpenAlexW4283373748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.