Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734340›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Comparative evaluation of authorized drugs for treating Covid-19 patients.

Towhidul Islam, Moynul Hasan, Mohammad Saydur Rahman, Md Rabiul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Docking and ADME-TOX Profiling ofAdvances in respiratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Severe COVID-19European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir in COVID-19: a profile of its use.Drugs & therapy perspectives : for rational drug selection and use · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Towhidul IslamDepartment of Pharmacy University of Asia Pacific Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-0740
Moynul HasanDepartment of Pharmacy Jagannath University Dhaka Bangladesh.
Mohammad Saydur RahmanDepartment of Pharmacy Jagannath University Dhaka Bangladesh.
Md Rabiul IslamDepartment of Pharmacy University of Asia Pacific Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-3144
Jagannath University · BDUniversity of Asia Pacific · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Vaccines are the first line of defense against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, the antiviral drugs provide a new tool to fight the Covid-19 pandemic. Here we aimed for a comparative evaluation of authorized drugs for treating Covid-19 patients. Methods: We searched in PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords and terms such as Covid, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus disease 2019, therapeutic management, hospitalized Covid-19 patients, Covid-19 treatment. We also gathered information from reputed newspapers, web portals, and websites. We thoroughly observed, screened, and included the studies relevant to our inclusion criteria. We included only the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized drugs for this review. Results: We found that molnupiravir and paxlovid are available for oral use, and remdesivir is for only hospitalized patients. Paxlovid is a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, nirmatrelvir is a protease inhibitor (ritonavir increases the concentration of nirmatrelvir), and the other two (remdesivir and molnupiravir) are nucleoside analog prodrugs. Remdesivir and molnupiravir doses do not need to adjust in renal and hepatic impairment. However, the paxlovid dose adjustment is required for mild to moderate renal or hepatic impaired patients. Also, the drug is not allowed for Covid-19 patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment. Preliminary studies showed oral antiviral drugs significantly reduce hospitalization or death among mild to severe patients. Moreover, the US FDA has approved four monoclonal antibodies for Covid-19 treatment. Studies suggest that these drugs would reduce the risk of hospitalization or severity of symptoms. World Health Organization strongly recommended the use of corticosteroids along with other antiviral drugs for severe or critically hospitalized patients. Conclusion: All authorized drugs are effective in inhibiting viral replication for most SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, along with vaccines, these drugs might potentially aid in fighting the Covid-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

antiviralsCovid‐19dexamethasonemolnupiravirmonoclonal antibodypaxlovidremdesivirSARS‐CoV‐2

Identifiers

PMID35734340
PMCPMC9194463
OpenAlexW4282828893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.