Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734487›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2021

CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING AND TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS CONTROL IN CHILD, ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT POPULATION - ARGUMENTS FOR ITS USE AND EFFECTS.

Karla Rubelj, Gordana Stipančić, Lavinia La Grasta Sabolić, Marija Požgaj Šepec

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karla Rubelj1Department of Pediatrics, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Pediatrics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Gordana Stipančić1Department of Pediatrics, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Pediatrics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lavinia La Grasta Sabolić1Department of Pediatrics, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Pediatrics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marija Požgaj Šepec1Department of Pediatrics, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Department of Pediatrics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensors for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in intercellular fluid are used as a contemporary method to achieve better control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), which is best shown through lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.The aim of this study was to assess how many of our patients used CGM (parents were solely financing all the cost of the device) and what was the effect of CGM on the control of DM. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of patients actively treated at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Pulmonology and Allergology, Department of Pediatrics, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center. The t-test was used for independent samples to compare the mean levels of HbA1c before and after the inclusion of CGM. CGM was used by 81 (32.1%) of our patients with type 1 DM, of which 43 met the inclusion criteria. The mean HbA1c level 6 months before the introduction of CGM was 8.2%±1.9 and after 12 months of CGM use it was 7.4%±1.2, which was a statistically significant improvement (p=0.026). Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the greatest improvement in HbA1c level was recorded in the groups of young adults (18-25 years) and youngest children (<12 years). We confirmed the efficacy of CGM in achieving better control of type 1 DM by significantly improving HbA1c levels in a population of highly motivated patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAdolescentsChildrenContinuous glucose monitoringType 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35734487
PMCPMC9196217
OpenAlexW4285547261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.