ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Perioperative Fluoroquinolone Treatment Deteriorates Prognosis Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Former studies have revealed that fluoroquinolone (FQ) can induce aortic expansion and rupture. While FQ is widely used in perioperative anti-infection therapy, its impact on graft patency and patient survival is unknown. Methods: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) data were extracted from the MIMIC-III database. Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, t-tests, or ANOVAs were used to compare baseline data between groups determined by FQ therapy status, depending on the data type. Propensity score matching was used to establish a balanced cohort. Cox regression was used to investigate the impact of FQ on CABG patient survival, whereas paired t-tests were used to analyze secondary results. Results: Of the 5030 patients who underwent CABG, 937 (18.6%) received oral or intravenous FQ therapy. Using propensity score matching, these 819 patients were successfully matched with 819 controls in a 1:1 ratio. Cox regression showed that FQ significantly decreased survival among CABG patients (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.21−2.15, p = 0.001). Furthermore, FQ usage was associated with longer hospitalization (<0.0001), ICU duration (<0.0001), ventilation period (<0.0001), and duration of vasopressor administration (<0.0001). Conclusions: Perioperative FQ therapy was associated with worse prognosis and a more difficult recovery among patients with CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.