Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735973›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2022

Nonlinear Reconstruction of Images from Patterns Generated by Deterministic or Random Optical Masks-Concepts and Review of Research.

Daniel Smith, Shivasubramanian Gopinath, Francis Gracy Arockiaraj, Andra Naresh Kumar Reddy, Vinoth Balasubramani, Ravi Kumar, Nitin Dubey, Soon Hock Ng, Tomas Katkus, Shakina Jothi Selva and 15 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Daniel SmithOptical Sciences Center and ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials (SEAM), School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Optical Sciences Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Shivasubramanian GopinathPG & Research Department of Physics, Thiagarajar College, Madurai 625009, India.
Francis Gracy ArockiarajPG & Research Department of Physics, The American College, Madurai 625009, India.
Andra Naresh Kumar ReddyHee Photonic Labs, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-9250
Vinoth BalasubramaniDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-1136
Ravi KumarSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7614-6784
Nitin DubeySchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Soon Hock NgOptical Sciences Center and ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials (SEAM), School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Optical Sciences Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-3399
Tomas KatkusOptical Sciences Center and ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials (SEAM), School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Optical Sciences Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Shakina Jothi SelvaPG & Research Department of Physics, The American College, Madurai 625009, India.
Dhanalakshmi RenganathanPG & Research Department of Physics, Thiagarajar College, Madurai 625009, India.
Manueldoss Beaula Ruby KamalamPG & Research Department of Physics, The American College, Madurai 625009, India.
Aravind Simon John Francis RajeswaryInstitute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Srinivasan NavaneethakrishnanPG & Research Department of Physics, Thiagarajar College, Madurai 625009, India.
Stephen Rajkumar InbanathanPG & Research Department of Physics, The American College, Madurai 625009, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6022-9013
Sandhra-Mirella ValdmaInstitute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Periyasamy Angamuthu PraveenInstitute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Jayavel AmudhavelInstitute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-0733
Manoj KumarInstitute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-0677
Rashid A GaneevLaboratory of Nonlinear Optics, University of Latvia, Jelgavas 3, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Pierre J MagistrettiDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Christian DepeursingeDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Saulius JuodkazisOptical Sciences Center and ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials (SEAM), School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Optical Sciences Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3542-3874
Joseph RosenSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-2180
Vijayakumar AnandOptical Sciences Center and ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials (SEAM), School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Optical Sciences Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-1949

Funding

Australian Research Council LP190100505European Union 857627 (CIPHR)State Education Development Agency 1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/436 Republic of LatviaState Education Development Agency 1.1.1.5/19/A/003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect-imaging methods involve at least two steps, namely optical recording and computational reconstruction. The optical-recording process uses an optical modulator that transforms the light from the object into a typical intensity distribution. This distribution is numerically processed to reconstruct the object's image corresponding to different spatial and spectral dimensions. There have been numerous optical-modulation functions and reconstruction methods developed in the past few years for different applications. In most cases, a compatible pair of the optical-modulation function and reconstruction method gives optimal performance. A new reconstruction method, termed nonlinear reconstruction (NLR), was developed in 2017 to reconstruct the object image in the case of optical-scattering modulators. Over the years, it has been revealed that the NLR can reconstruct an object's image modulated by an axicons, bifocal lenses and even exotic spiral diffractive elements, which generate deterministic optical fields. Apparently, NLR seems to be a universal reconstruction method for indirect imaging. In this review, the performance of NLR isinvestigated for many deterministic and stochastic optical fields. Simulation and experimental results for different cases are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

coded aperture imagingcomputational imagingdiffractive opticsFresnel incoherent correlation holographyholographynonlinear reconstructionrotating point spread functionscattering

Identifiers

PMID35735973
PMCPMC9225382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.