ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
miRNA Expression in Ovarian Cancer in Fresh Frozen, Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded and Plasma Samples.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proof of Concept Study: Comparison of Semi-Automated RNA Isolation Methods from Archived Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues with Clinical Routine RNA Isolation Methods.Methods and protocols · 2024Article
- Expression Stability Analysis of Candidate References for Normalization of RT-qPCR Data Using RefSeeker R package.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimMicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs involved in gene expression regulation and have been investigated as potential biomarkers for various diseases, including ovarian cancer (OC). However, lack of standardized protocols regarding e.g., RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, spike-in controls for experimental steps, and data normalization, impacts cross validation of results across research groups and hinders implementation of miRNAs as clinical biomarkers. MATERIALS AND
methodsRNA was isolated from matching fresh-frozen tissue (FF), formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue, and plasma samples from twenty women diagnosed with OC using three commercial kits: miRNeasy Tissue/Cells, miRNeasy FFPE, and miRNeasy Serum/Plasma (Qiagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and PCR performance were tested using miRCURY LNA miRNA Quality Control PCR (QC) Panels (Qiagen). Finally, miRNA stability was assessed using five algorithms: BestKeeper, Normfinder, GeNorm, comparative delta-Ct and comprehensive ranking provided by a web-based RefFinder tool.
resultsRNA from FF, FFPE and plasma was extracted using commercially available kits and the differences in yield and purity were examined. We developed a simple method for identifying and potentially excluding samples based on their crossing point values from RT-qPCR data, which could improve existing manufacture guidelines. Moreover, we discussed how assessment of miRNA stability differs between algorithms, possibly leading to inconsistent results.
conclusionWe present guidelines for RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and data normalization for successful miRNA expression profiling using RT-qPCR in corresponding biological OC specimens. We recommend QC panels in combination with spike-in controls and interplate controls to monitor process efficiencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.