ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
Incidence rate and predictors of recurrent aneurysms after clipping: long-term follow-up study of survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO), European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.European stroke journal · 2026Guideline
- Clinical Feasibility of PETRA-MRA for Long-Term Surveillance of Clipped Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective Single-Center Study in 546 Aneurysms.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Is there any risk for recurrence of a completely clipped intracranial aneurysm?Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- External carotid artery-radial artery graft-posterior cerebral artery bypass for complex vertebrobasilar aneurysms: efficacy and analysis of outcome in a single center.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- A predictive model for the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms following coil embolization.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent aneurysms are a major cause of re-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), but information on long-term clip durability and predictors is insufficient. This study aimed to present the incidence rate of > 10 years and investigate predictors of a recurrent aneurysm in aSAH survivors. We included 1601 patients admitted with aSAH and treated by microsurgical clipping between January 1993 and May 2010. Of these patients, 435 aSAH survivors were included in this study (27.2%). The total follow-up time was 5680.9 patient-years, and the overall incidence rate was 0.77% per patient-year. The cumulative probability of recurrence without residua and regrowth of the neck remnant was 0.7% and 13.9% at 10 years, respectively. Neck remnant (hazard ratio [HR], 10.311; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.233-20.313) and alcohol consumption over the moderate amount (HR, 3.166; 95% CI, 1.313-7.637) were independent risk factors of recurrent aneurysm. Current smoking and multiplicity at initial aSAH presentation were significant factors in a univariate analysis. Furthermore, de novo intracranial aneurysms (DNIAs) were more common in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (40.9% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001). In the present study, we noted the long-term clip durability and predictor of recurrence after microsurgical clipping. These findings can assist clinicians in identifying patients at a high risk of recurrent aneurysm and recommending selective long-term surveillance after microsurgical clipping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.