Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739399›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2022

Nano-omics: nanotechnology-based multidimensional harvesting of the blood-circulating cancerome.

Lois Gardner, Kostas Kostarelos, Parag Mallick, Caroline Dive, Marilena Hadjidemetriou

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Beyond the Needle: Is Liquid Biopsy the Future of Veterinary Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lois GardnerNanomedicine Lab, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kostas KostarelosNanomedicine Lab, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2224-6672
Parag MallickCanary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University, California, USA.
Caroline DiveCancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marilena HadjidemetriouNanomedicine Lab, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. marilena.hadjidemetriou@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-2112
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBStanford University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25435Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the development of 'simple' blood tests that enable cancer screening, diagnosis or monitoring and facilitate the design of personalized therapies without the need for invasive tumour biopsy sampling has been a core ambition in cancer research. Data emerging from ongoing biomarker development efforts indicate that multiple markers, used individually or as part of a multimodal panel, are required to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of assays for early stage cancer detection. The discovery of cancer-associated molecular alterations that are reflected in blood at multiple dimensions (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome) and integration of the resultant multi-omics data have the potential to uncover novel biomarkers as well as to further elucidate the underlying molecular pathways. Herein, we review key advances in multi-omics liquid biopsy approaches and introduce the 'nano-omics' paradigm: the development and utilization of nanotechnology tools for the enrichment and subsequent omics analysis of the blood-circulating cancerome.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProteomeBiomarkersGenomeHumansMetabolomeNanotechnologyTranscriptomeBiomarkersProteome

Identifiers

PMID35739399
OpenAlexW4283322319

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.