Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35741843›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

Network-Based Methods for Approaching Human Pathologies from a Phenotypic Point of View.

Juan A G Ranea, James Perkins, Mónica Chagoyen, Elena Díaz-Santiago, Florencio Pazos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan A G RaneaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain.
James PerkinsDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain.
Mónica ChagoyenComputational Systems Biology Group, Systems Biology Department, National Centre for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Elena Díaz-SantiagoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain.
Florencio PazosComputational Systems Biology Group, Systems Biology Department, National Centre for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network and systemic approaches to studying human pathologies are helping us to gain insight into the molecular mechanisms of and potential therapeutic interventions for human diseases, especially for complex diseases where large numbers of genes are involved. The complex human pathological landscape is traditionally partitioned into discrete "diseases"; however, that partition is sometimes problematic, as diseases are highly heterogeneous and can differ greatly from one patient to another. Moreover, for many pathological states, the set of symptoms (phenotypes) manifested by the patient is not enough to diagnose a particular disease. On the contrary, phenotypes, by definition, are directly observable and can be closer to the molecular basis of the pathology. These clinical phenotypes are also important for personalised medicine, as they can help stratify patients and design personalised interventions. For these reasons, network and systemic approaches to pathologies are gradually incorporating phenotypic information. This review covers the current landscape of phenotype-centred network approaches to study different aspects of human diseases.

Indexed as

PhenotypeHumansbiological networkgene priorizationnetwork medicinepathological phenotype

Identifiers

PMID35741843
PMCPMC9222217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.