Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35742416›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

New Technology and Loss of Paid Employment among Older Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.

Emil Sundstrup, Annette Meng, Jeppe Z N Ajslev, Karen Albertsen, Flemming Pedersen, Lars L Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emil SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette MengNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-7600
Jeppe Z N AjslevNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen AlbertsenTeam Working Life, 2500 Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9846-9098
Flemming PedersenTeam Working Life, 2500 Valby, Denmark.
Lars L AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the association between the implementation of new technology in the workplace and the subsequent loss of paid employment among older workers.

methodsWe estimated the prospective risk of loss of paid employment (register-based) from questions on new technology among 10,320 older workers (≥50 years). To investigate potential differences between work types, analyses were stratified by job function: (1) work with symbols (office, administration, analysis, IT), (2) work with people (people, service, care), (3) work in the field of production (processing, producing or moving things).

resultsThe introduction of new technology at the workplace reduced the risk of losing paid employment among older workers working with symbols (risk ratio [RR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.76) and in the field of production (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.85), whereas new technology increased this risk among those working with people (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.19-1.26). Being involved in the introduction of new technology and receiving adequate training in its use decreased the risk of loss of paid employment.

conclusionsDepending on the context, the introduction of new technology at work associates positively as well as negatively with future labour market participation among older workers. Worker involvement and adequate training in the use of new technology seem to be important for retaining workers in the labour market.

Indexed as

EmploymentWorkplaceHumansOccupationsProspective StudiesRetirementTechnologyautomationdigitalizationhealthretirementsenior workerstechnological change

Identifiers

PMID35742416
PMCPMC9222591

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.