Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35744797›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Intervention of Prebiotics on Depression via the Gut-Brain Axis.

Qinghui He, Congcong Si, Zhenjiao Sun, Yuhui Chen, Xin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Impact ofNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gut Microbiota-Driven Pathways Linking Chronic Stress to Tumor Progression.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qinghui HeAmway (China) R&D Centre Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510730, China.
Congcong SiNingbo Tech-inno Health Industry Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315211, China.
Zhenjiao SunNingbo Tech-inno Health Industry Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315211, China.
Yuhui ChenNingbo Tech-inno Health Industry Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315211, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5795-9197
Ningbo University · CN

Funding

Ningbo Natural Science Foundation 2021J109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The imbalance of intestinal microbiota can cause the accumulation of endotoxin in the main circulation system of the human body, which has a great impact on human health. Increased work and life pressure have led to a rise in the number of people falling into depression, which has also reduced their quality of life. The gut-brain axis (GBA) is closely related to the pathological basis of depression, and intestinal microbiota can improve depressive symptoms through GBA. Previous studies have proven that prebiotics can modulate intestinal microbiota and thus participate in human health regulation. We reviewed the regulatory mechanism of intestinal microbiota on depression through GBA, and discussed the effects of prebiotics, including plant polysaccharides and polyphenols on the regulation of intestinal microbiota, providing new clues for the prevention and treatment of depression.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsBrain-Gut AxisDepressionHumansPrebioticsQuality of LifePrebioticsdepressionGBAintestinal microbiotaprebiotics

Identifiers

PMID35744797
PMCPMC9230023
OpenAlexW4282587918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.