Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748917›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2022

A roadmap to achieve pharmacological precision medicine in diabetes.

Jose C Florez, Ewan R Pearson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Precision Medicine in Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2023
    Review
  19. Chemical Compounds and Ambient Factors Affecting Pancreatic Alpha-Cells Mass and Function: What Evidence?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose C FlorezCenter for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. jcflorez@mgh.harvard.edu.
Ewan R PearsonDepartment of Population Health & Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK. E.Z.Pearson@dundee.ac.uk.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

RADIANT Clinic and Data Coordinating CenterU54DK118612 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Louis H. Philipson, Miriam Sargon Udler · 2018 to 2026
$21.9M
Bridging the gap between type 2 diabetes GWAS and therapeutic targetsUM1DK126185 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CLAUSSNITZER, MELINA C, GLOYN, ANNA LOUISE · 2020 to 2024
$9.5M
Equipment Supplement for Discovery of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3R01GM117163 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FLOREZ, JOSE CARLOS, HEDDERSON, MONIQUE MARIE · 2015 to 2023
$5.5M
Pharmacogenetic discovery in the GRADE comparative effectiveness type 2 diabetes clinical trialR01DK123019 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FLOREZ, JOSE CARLOS · 2021 to 2024
$2.6M
Mentoring Investigators on the Clinical Translation of Cardiometabolic Genetic DiscoveriesK24HL157960 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FLOREZ, JOSE CARLOS · 2021 to 2025
$626k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL157960NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123019NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK118612NIDDK NIH HHS UM1 DK126185NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117163Wellcome Trust 102820/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pharmacological treatment of diabetes is largely algorithmic. Other than for cardiovascular disease or renal disease, where sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are indicated, the choice of treatment is based upon overall risks of harm or side effect and cost, and not on probable benefit. Here we argue that a more precise approach to treatment choice is necessary to maximise benefit and minimise harm from existing diabetes therapies. We propose a roadmap to achieve precision medicine as standard of care, to discuss current progress in relation to monogenic diabetes and type 2 diabetes, and to determine what additional work is required. The first step is to identify robust and reliable genetic predictors of response, recognising that genotype is static over time and provides the skeleton upon which modifiers such as clinical phenotype and metabolic biomarkers can be overlaid. The second step is to identify these metabolic biomarkers (e.g. beta cell function, insulin sensitivity, BMI, liver fat, metabolite profile), which capture the metabolic state at the point of prescribing and may have a large impact on drug response. Third, we need to show that predictions that utilise these genetic and metabolic biomarkers improve therapeutic outcomes for patients, and fourth, that this is cost-effective. Finally, these biomarkers and prediction models need to be embedded in clinical care systems to enable effective and equitable clinical implementation. Whilst this roadmap is largely complete for monogenic diabetes, we still have considerable work to do to implement this for type 2 diabetes. Increasing collaborations, including with industry, and access to clinical trial data should enable progress to implementation of precision treatment in type 2 diabetes in the near future.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2BiomarkersGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPrecision MedicineSodiumBiomarkersGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsSodiumBiomarkerDiabetesGeneticMonogenicPersonalised medicinePharmacogeneticsPharmacologicalPrecision medicineReviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID35748917
PMCPMC9522818
OpenAlexW4283376467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.