SynthesisRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2022
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism.
Synthesis in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07393152 (Studio Pilota su Strumenti Collaborativi, Globali, Multidimensionali e di qualità Della Vita Per la Definizione Delle priorità, lo Sviluppo di Processi Decisionali Condivisi, la Valutazione Degli Esiti e il Miglioramento Della qualità Delle Cure Per le Persone Con Disturbi Dello Spettro Autistico), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Studio Pilota su Strumenti Collaborativi, Globali, Multidimensionali e di qualità Della Vita Per la Definizione Delle priorità, lo Sviluppo di Processi Decisionali Condivisi, la Valutazione Degli Esiti e il Miglioramento Della qualità Delle Cure Per le Persone Con Disturbi Dello Spettro Autistico (ASD) Nella Pratica Clinica Quotidiana.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging research and practice: a pilot trial of an adapted social skills program for autism in public services.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Candidate diagnostic biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNaturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies.
methodsStudies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD.
resultsFourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twentyfour neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies.
conclusionsCross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.