Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35753880›Full record

ArticleJournal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics2022

Patient Compliance With Wearing Lower Limb Assistive Devices: A Scoping Review.

Ayisha Z Bashir, Danae M Dinkel, Iraklis I Pipinos, Jason M Johanning, Sara A Myers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07439315 (The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07439315 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcarus Medical InnovationsRan2026 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsMedial Compartment Knee OsteoarthritisArmsMedial joint distraction brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayisha Z BashirDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska. Electronic address: abashir@unomaha.edu.
Danae M DinkelDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska.
Iraklis I PipinosDepartment of Surgery and Research Service, Omaha VA Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Jason M JohanningDepartment of Surgery and Research Service, Omaha VA Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Sara A MyersDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Surgery and Research Service, Omaha VA Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · USOmaha VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage and inflammation in claudicationR01AG034995 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PIPINOS, IRAKLIS ILIAS · 2010 to 2014
$5.2M
Improving mobility in peripheral artery disease using an ankle foot orthosisR01HD090333 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI MYERS, SARA A · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Exoskeleton footwear to improve walking performance and subject-reported preference.I01RX003266 · VA · OMAHA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MYERS, SARA A, PIPINOS, IRAKLIS ILIAS · 2020 to 2024
–
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034995NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090333RRD VA I01 RX003266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this scoping review was to identify information on compliance with wearing orthoses and other supportive devices, to discuss the barriers to adherence, and to suggest strategies for improvement based on these findings.

methodsOnline databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles about patients' compliance with regard to lower limb assistive devices. In addition, a methodological quality control process was conducted. Studies were included if in the English language and related to compliance and adherence to the lower limb assistive device. Exclusion was based on first reading the abstract and then the full manuscript confirming content was not related to orthotic devices and compliance.

resultsTwelve studies were included. The data revealed between 6% and 80% of patients were not using a prescribed device. Barriers to the use of the orthotic device included medical, functional, device properties and lack of proper fit. Strategies for improved compliance included better communication between patient and clinician, patient education, and improved comfort and device esthetics.

conclusionsIndividualized orthotic adjustments, rehabilitation, and patient education were promising for increasing adherence. Despite positive aspects of improvements in gait, balance in elderly, and a sense of security produced by using assistive devices, compliance remains less than ideal due to barriers. As compliance in recent studies has not improved, continued work in this area is essential to realize the benefits of technological advances in orthotic and assistive devices.

Indexed as

Orthotic DevicesSelf-Help DevicesAgedHumansLower ExtremityPatient ComplianceFoot OrthosisLower ExtremitiesOrthotic DevicesPatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID35753880
PMCPMC9329246
OpenAlexW4283378225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.