ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Treatment of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease with Chinese Herbal Medicine (BanxiaXiexin Decoction): Evidence from Meta-Analysis.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Shugan Hewei formula combined with rabeprazole in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.European journal of medical research · 2024Trial
- Effects of Natural Health Products in Combination with FP-Based Chemotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Traditional Chinese medicine for chronic atrophic gastritis: Efficacy, mechanisms and targets.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Banxia-Xiexin Decoction Ameliorates Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Inflammatory Responses and the Complement and Coagulation Cascade Pathway.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Topic Modeling Analysis of Chinese Medicine Literature on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Insights into Potential Treatment.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024Article
- Therapeutic effect of Wendan Decoction combined with mosapride on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophageal cancer surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Probiotics for functional constipation in children: an overview of overlapping systematic reviews.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) are still controversial on the effectiveness of Banxia Xiexin decoction (BXD) to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To assess the evidence reliability and inform the clinical use of BXD, we performed a meta-analysis from previous SRs/MAs to collate, critically appraise, and synthesize the effectiveness of BXD treatment in GERD. Methods: SRs/MAs were collected by searching major medical databases. The included studies were evaluated in terms of methodological quality and quality of evidence using criteria from the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, respectively. Results: Six SRs/MAs were included in this study. The methodological quality of SRs/MAs was generally unsatisfactory. Unregistered protocols, failure to provide a list of excluded trials, and lack of a comprehensive search strategy were the main limitations of previous SRs/MAs. No high-quality evidence was found to support the effect of BXD on GERD patients. The qualitative data synthesis relied on low-quality trials with a small sample size, which was the main factor for evidence degradation. Conclusions: BXD seems to have promising efficacy to treat GERD patients. Although the quality of SRs/MAs was generally low and defects were frequent, our study highlights areas where methodologies need to be improved.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.