Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754795›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

A Prospective Review on Selectable Marker-Free Genome Engineered Rice: Past, Present and Future Scientific Realm.

Rajveer Singh, Navneet Kaur, Umesh Preethi Praba, Gurwinder Kaur, Mohammad Jafar Tanin, Pankaj Kumar, Kumari Neelam, Jagdeep Singh Sandhu, Yogesh Vikal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rajveer SinghSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Navneet KaurSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Umesh Preethi PrabaSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Gurwinder KaurSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Mohammad Jafar TaninDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Pankaj KumarSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Kumari NeelamSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Jagdeep Singh SandhuSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Yogesh VikalSchool of Agricultural Biotechnology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a staple food crop, rice has gained mainstream attention in genome engineering for its genetic improvement. Genome engineering technologies such as transgenic and genome editing have enabled the significant improvement of target traits in relation to various biotic and abiotic aspects as well as nutrition, for which genetic diversity is lacking. In comparison to conventional breeding, genome engineering techniques are more precise and less time-consuming. However, one of the major issues with biotech rice commercialization is the utilization of selectable marker genes (SMGs) in the vector construct, which when incorporated into the genome are considered to pose risks to human health, the environment, and biodiversity, and thus become a matter of regulation. Various conventional strategies (co-transformation, transposon, recombinase systems, and MAT-vector) have been used in rice to avoid or remove the SMG from the developed events. However, the major limitations of these methods are; time-consuming, leftover cryptic sequences in the genome, and there is variable frequency. In contrast to these methods, CRISPR/Cas9-based marker excision, marker-free targeted gene insertion, programmed self-elimination, and RNP-based delivery enable us to generate marker-free engineered rice plants precisely and in less time. Although the CRISPR/Cas9-based SMG-free approaches are in their early stages, further research and their utilization in rice could help to break the regulatory barrier in its commercialization. In the current review, we have discussed the limitations of traditional methods followed by advanced techniques. We have also proposed a hypothesis, "DNA-free marker-less transformation" to overcome the regulatory barriers posed by SMGs.

Indexed as

clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/crispr associated Cas9 (Crispr/Cas9)genetically modified (GM) -regulationgenetic engineeringriceselectable marker genes (SMGs)

Identifiers

PMID35754795
PMCPMC9219106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.