ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2022
Performance Development of European Swimmers Across the Olympic Cycle.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Single Dose of Beetroot Juice not Enhance Performance during Intervallic Swimming Efforts.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2024Trial
- Stroke rate-stroke length dynamics in elite freestyle swimming: application of kernel density estimation.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Optimization of swim depth across diverse taxa during horizontal travel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Determining Validity and Reliability of an In-Field Performance Analysis System for Swimming.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Specializing When It Counts: Comparing the Dose-Time Effect of Distance Variety between Swimming and Track Running.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of the fastest backstroke age group swimmers competing in the World Masters Championships 1986-2024.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quantity of within-sport distance variety - what can pool swimmers and track runners learn from each other?Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Where are the fastest master butterfly swimmers competing in the FINA World Masters Championships from?EXCLI journal · 2023Article
- Tracking performance and its underlying characteristics in talented swimmers: a longitudinal study during the junior-to-senior transition.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Differences in Race Characteristics between World-Class Individual-Medley and Stroke-Specialist Swimmers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effects of beetroot juice intake on repeated performance of competitive swimmers.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of the study were to (1) quantify the performance development of race times and key performance indicators of European swimmers across the last Olympic cycle (from 2016 to 2021) and (2) provide reference values for long-course swimming pool events for both sexes from 50 m to 1,500 m including butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, freestyle, and individual medley. Individual events from the 2016 and 2021 European swimming championships were included. Specifically, 246 men (age: 24.2 ± 3.4 years, FINA points: 890 ± 40) and 256 women races (age: 24.2 ± 4, FINA points: 879 ± 38) of the finalists were recorded and key performance indicators and split times analyzed. Performance differences in finalists of the 2016 and 2021 European championships were determined by an independent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.