ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Calculating and Comparing the Annualized Relapse Rate and Estimating the Confidence Interval in Relapsing Neurological Diseases.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor neurotoxicity: long-term outcomes with focus on 1-year neurological sequelae.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Long-Term Clinical and Psychological Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-World Longitudinal Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Treatments in Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of anti-CD20 therapies and S1P receptor modulators in late-onset multiple sclerosis: real-world evidence from the MSBase registry.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- The Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register Experience With Cladribine: Impact on Relapses, PIRA, and Treatment Sequencing Strategies Evaluation.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Long-Term Evaluation of Effectiveness and Immunological Implications of Ocrelizumab in a Real-World Cohort.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Insights into neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and pregnancy from a single-center study in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Rituximab treatment in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Real-world annualized relapse rates from contemporary multiple sclerosis clinics in the UK: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Moving forward through the in silico modeling of multiple sclerosis: Treatment layer implementation and validation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Impaired response of blood neutrophils to cell-death stimulus differentiates AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD from MOGAD.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2022Article
- Real-world effectiveness of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calculating the crude or adjusted annualized relapse rate (ARR) and its confidence interval (CI) is often required in clinical studies to evaluate chronic relapsing diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. However, accurately calculating ARR and estimating the 95% CI requires careful application of statistical approaches and basic familiarity with the exponential family of distributions. When the relapse rate can be regarded as constant over time or by individuals, the crude ARR can be calculated using the person-years method, which divides the number of all observed relapses among all participants by the total follow-up period of the study cohort. If the number of relapses can be modeled by the Poisson distribution, the 95% CI of ARR can be obtained by finding the 2.5% upper and lower critical values of the parameter λ as the mean. Basic familiarity with F-statistics is also required when comparing the ARR between two disease groups. It is necessary to distinguish the observed relapse rate ratio (RR) between two sample groups (sample RR) from the unobserved RR between their originating populations (population RR). The ratio of population RR to sample RR roughly follows the F distribution, with degrees of freedom obtained by doubling the number of observed relapses in the two sample groups. Based on this, a 95% CI of the population RR can be estimated. When the count data of the response variable is overdispersed, the negative binomial distribution would be a better fit than the Poisson. Adjusted ARR and the 95% CI can be obtained by using the generalized linear regression models after selecting appropriate error structures (e.g., Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, and zero-inflated negative binomial) according to the overdispersion and zero-inflation in the response variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.