Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35757033›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2022

Immunological reaction to magnesium-based implants for orthopedic applications. What do we know so far? A systematic review on

Omer Suljevic, Stefan F Fischerauer, Annelie M Weinberg, Nicole G Sommer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Application progress of customized steel plates in osteotomy and orthopedic treatment of knee osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioactive materials · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omer SuljevicDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stefan F FischerauerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Annelie M WeinbergDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicole G SommerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnesium-based implants (Mg) became an attractive candidate in orthopedic surgery due to their valuable properties, such as osteoconductivity, biodegradability, elasticity and mechanical strength. However, previous studies on biodegradable and non-biodegradable metal implants showed that these materials are not inert when placed

Indexed as

BoneFBGCs, Foreign Body Giant CellsFBR, Foreign Body ReactionImmunologyImplantsInflammationMgMg, MagnesiumOrthopedicsSYRCLE, Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation

Identifiers

PMID35757033
PMCPMC9214802
OpenAlexW4282923979

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.