ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Effects of Osimertinib Combined With Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Health Care Training on Pulmonary Function, Complications, and Quality of Life in Patients After Radical Resection of Lung Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of radical resection of lung cancer combined with breathing training on lung cancer patients in thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Bevacizumab Plus EGFR-TKIs vs EGFR-TKIs Alone for Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effects of osimertinib combined with pulmonary rehabilitation and health care training on pulmonary function, complications, and the quality of life (QOL) in patients after radical resection of lung cancer. Methods: The data of 120 patients with radical resection of lung cancer admitted to Results: Compared with group q, the pulmonary function was higher ( Conclusion: The combination of osimertinib and pulmonary rehabilitation and health care training can improve the pulmonary function of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with radical resection of lung cancer, and reduce their postoperative morbidity, thereby improving their QOL, which is conducive to reducing the patient's and society's medical burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.