Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760985›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Classification of the plant-associated lifestyle of Pseudomonas strains using genome properties and machine learning.

Wasin Poncheewin, Anne D van Diepeningen, Theo A J van der Lee, Maria Suarez-Diez, Peter J Schaap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inoculation withPeerJ · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wasin PoncheewinLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anne D van DiepeningenBU Biointeractions and Plant Health, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Theo A J van der LeeBU Biointeractions and Plant Health, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Maria Suarez-DiezLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter J SchaapLaboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. peter.schaap@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhizosphere, the region of soil surrounding roots of plants, is colonized by a unique population of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Many important PGPR as well as plant pathogens belong to the genus Pseudomonas. There is, however, uncertainty on the divide between beneficial and pathogenic strains as previously thought to be signifying genomic features have limited power to separate these strains. Here we used the Genome properties (GP) common biological pathways annotation system and Machine Learning (ML) to establish the relationship between the genome wide GP composition and the plant-associated lifestyle of 91 Pseudomonas strains isolated from the rhizosphere and the phyllosphere representing both plant-associated phenotypes. GP enrichment analysis, Random Forest model fitting and feature selection revealed 28 discriminating features. A test set of 75 new strains confirmed the importance of the selected features for classification. The results suggest that GP annotations provide a promising computational tool to better classify the plant-associated lifestyle.

Indexed as

PseudomonasRhizosphereMachine LearningPlant RootsPlantsSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID35760985
PMCPMC9237127

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.