Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761373›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2022

Diagnosis of animal trypanosomoses: proper use of current tools and future prospects.

Marc Desquesnes, Alireza Sazmand, Marisa Gonzatti, Alain Boulangé, Géraldine Bossard, Sophie Thévenon, Geoffrey Gimonneau, Philippe Truc, Stéphane Herder, Sophie Ravel and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Serological surveillance ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Identification and Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Marc DesquesnesUMR INTERTRYP, French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), 31076, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-2422
Alireza SazmandDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, 6517658978, Iran. alireza.sazmand@basu.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-2993
Marisa GonzattiDepartment of Cell Biology, Simón Bolívar University, Caracas, 1080, Venezuela.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-2988
Alain BoulangéINTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-7465
Géraldine BossardINTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-3101
Sophie ThévenonINTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-5884
Geoffrey GimonneauINTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-841X
Philippe TrucIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-1954
Stéphane HerderIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6283-6207
Sophie RavelIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3093-5208
Denis SerenoIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-9291
Etienne WaleckxIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-6476
Vincent JamonneauIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8427-0769
Philippe JacquietNational Veterinary School of Toulouse (ENVT), 23 chemin des Capelles, 31000, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-2904
Sathaporn JittapalapongFaculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-8050
David BerthierINTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-6588
Philippe SolanoIRD, UMR INTERTRYP, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-3506
Laurent HébertPhysiopathology & Epidemiology of Equine Diseases Unit (PhEED), Laboratory of Animal Health, Normandy Site, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Rd 675 Les Places, 14430, Goustranville, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5738-9913
Université de Montpellier · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRBu-Ali Sina University · IRDépartement Santé Animale · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRKasetsart University · THSimón Bolívar University · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable diagnostic tools are needed to choose the appropriate treatment and proper control measures for animal trypanosomoses, some of which are pathogenic. Trypanosoma cruzi, for example, is responsible for Chagas disease in Latin America. Similarly, pathogenic animal trypanosomoses of African origin (ATAO), including a variety of Trypanosoma species and subspecies, are currently found in Africa, Latin America and Asia. ATAO limit global livestock productivity and impact food security and the welfare of domestic animals. This review focusses on implementing previously reviewed diagnostic methods, in a complex epizootiological scenario, by critically assessing diagnostic results at the individual or herd level. In most cases, a single diagnostic method applied at a given time does not unequivocally identify the various parasitological and disease statuses of a host. These include "non-infected", "asymptomatic carrier", "sick infected", "cured/not cured" and/or "multi-infected". The diversity of hosts affected by these animal trypanosomoses and their vectors (or other routes of transmission) is such that integrative, diachronic approaches are needed that combine: (i) parasite detection, (ii) DNA, RNA or antigen detection and (iii) antibody detection, along with epizootiological information. The specificity of antibody detection tests is restricted to the genus or subgenus due to cross-reactivity with other Trypanosoma spp. and Trypanosomatidae, but sensitivity is high. The DNA-based methods implemented over the last three decades have yielded higher specificity and sensitivity for active infection detection in hosts and vectors. However, no single diagnostic method can detect all active infections and/or trypanosome species or subspecies. The proposed integrative approach will improve the prevention, surveillance and monitoring of animal trypanosomoses with the available diagnostic tools. However, further developments are required to address specific gaps in diagnostic methods and the sustainable control or elimination of these diseases.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseTrypanosomaTrypanosoma cruziTrypanosomiasisAfricaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticIntegrative trypanosomosis diagnosisPan-trypanosome ELISAPOCDPSRTrypanosomeTrypanosomosis

Identifiers

PMID35761373
PMCPMC9238167
OpenAlexW4283575365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.