Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765652›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

A brief review of protein-ligand interaction prediction.

Lingling Zhao, Yan Zhu, Junjie Wang, Naifeng Wen, Chunyu Wang, Liang Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decision Tree for Prediction of Binding Affinity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. CLAPE: Protein-Ligand Binding Site Prediction via Protein Language Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lingling ZhaoFaculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Yan ZhuFaculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Naifeng WenSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, China.
Chunyu WangFaculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Liang ChengCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The task of identifying protein-ligand interactions (PLIs) plays a prominent role in the field of drug discovery. However, it is infeasible to identify potential PLIs via costly and laborious

Indexed as

Drug discoveryDrug-target binding affinityMachine learningProtein–ligand interactions

Identifiers

PMID35765652
PMCPMC9189993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.