Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768524›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The importance of self-efficacy and negative affect for neurofeedback success for central neuropathic pain after a spinal cord injury.

Krithika Anil, Sara Demain, Jane Burridge, David Simpson, Julian Taylor, Imogen Cotter, Aleksandra Vuckovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Krithika AnilFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. krithika.anil@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8027-1665
Sara DemainFaculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Jane BurridgeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David SimpsonFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Julian TaylorSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain.
Imogen CotterDepartment of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.
Aleksandra VuckovicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Southampton · GBStoke Mandeville Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG-based neurofeedback uses mental behaviours (MB) to enable voluntary self-modulation of brain activity, and has potential to relieve central neuropathic pain (CNP) after a spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aimed to understand neurofeedback learning and the relationship between MB and neurofeedback success. Twenty-five non-CNP participants and ten CNP participants received neurofeedback training (reinforcing 9-12 Hz; suppressing 4-8 Hz and 20-30 Hz) on four visits. Participants were interviewed about the MB they used after each visit. Questionnaires examined the following factors: self-efficacy, locus of control, motivation, and workload of neurofeedback. MB were grouped into mental strategies (a goal-directed mental action) and affect (emotional experience during neurofeedback). Successful non-CNP participants significantly used more imagination-related MS and reported more negative affect compared to successful CNP participants. However, no mental strategy was clearly associated with neurofeedback success. There was some association between the lack of success and negative affect. Self-efficacy was moderately correlated with neurofeedback success (r = < 0.587, p = < 0.020), whereas locus of control, motivation, and workload had low, non-significant correlations (r < 0.300, p > 0.05). Affect may be more important than mental strategies for a successful neurofeedback performance. Self-efficacy was associated with neurofeedback success, suggesting that increasing confidence in one's neurofeedback abilities may improve neurofeedback performance.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaNeurofeedbackSpinal Cord InjuriesElectroencephalographyHumansSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35768524
PMCPMC9243249
OpenAlexW4283696876

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.