ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022
Effect and Safety of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics and Diet Modifications: A Holistic Approach to Tackling Helicobacter pylori with the Help of the Gut Microbiota.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The Aging Stomach: Clinical Implications ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Helicobacter pylori Eradication Treatment in Older Patients.Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- Success of susceptibility-guided eradication ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Comparison of the management of Helicobacter pylori infection between the older and younger European populations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Correlation analysis of endoscopic manifestations and eradication effect ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Focusing onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The elderly people generally have poor tolerance to drugs and an increased risk of adverse effects. Our study was designed to determine the effect and safety of Methods: A total of 364 people were retrospectively analyzed, including 113 older people over 60 and 251 young and middle-aged people in the age of 20-59 years. Real-time PCR detection and conventional PCR and sequencing method were used for drug susceptibility testing. As the main outcome measure, the eradication rates (ERs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed by intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP). For the safety of therapy, adverse events were analyzed. Results: For the total people, the resistance rates to clarithromycin (CLR), amoxicillin (AMX), fluoroquinolone (FLQ) and tetracycline (TET) were 65.06%, 7.54%, 61.39% and 20.37%, respectively. After they were divided into two groups, the resistance rates were 62.39% (CLR), 9.09% (AMX), 69.64% (FLQ) and 22.45% (TET) in the 113 older people over 60, and 66.26%, 6.85%, 57.66% and 19.47% in the 251 young and middle-aged people in 20-59. By the ITT analysis, the ERs were 92.04% (95% CI, 86.97-97.10%, n=113) in the older people and 92.43% (95% CI, 89.14-95.73%, n=251) in the young and middle-aged people. By the PP analysis, the ERs were 96.30% (95% CI, 92.68-99.92%, n=108) and 94.69% (95% CI, 91.87-97.52%, n=245), respectively. No significant differences were shown both in the ITT analysis (P=0.896) and in the PP analysis (P=0.517). The three most common adverse events were black stool, dysgeusia and diarrhea, and no serious adverse event was reported. Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.