Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35770682›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2022

Developmental and evolutionary comparative analysis of a regulatory landscape in mouse and chicken.

Aurélie Hintermann, Isabel Guerreiro, Lucille Lopez-Delisle, Christopher Chase Bolt, Sandra Gitto, Denis Duboule, Leonardo Beccari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sequential inGenes & development · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie HintermannDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-4165
Isabel GuerreiroDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-3535
Lucille Lopez-DelisleSwiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (EPFL ISREC), School of Life Sciences, Federal School of Technology (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-4960
Christopher Chase BoltSwiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (EPFL ISREC), School of Life Sciences, Federal School of Technology (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-3552
Sandra GittoDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-7335
Denis DubouleDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-2960
Leonardo BeccariDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 30 quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-5105
University of Geneva · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications in gene regulation are driving forces in the evolution of organisms. Part of these changes involve cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which contact their target genes through higher-order chromatin structures. However, how such architectures and variations in CREs contribute to transcriptional evolvability remains elusive. We use Hoxd genes as a paradigm for the emergence of regulatory innovations, as many relevant enhancers are located in a regulatory landscape highly conserved in amniotes. Here, we analysed their regulation in murine vibrissae and chicken feather primordia, two skin appendages expressing different Hoxd gene subsets, and compared the regulation of these genes in these appendages with that in the elongation of the posterior trunk. In the two former structures, distinct subsets of Hoxd genes are contacted by different lineage-specific enhancers, probably as a result of using an ancestral chromatin topology as an evolutionary playground, whereas the gene regulation that occurs in the mouse and chicken embryonic trunk partially relies on conserved CREs. A high proportion of these non-coding sequences active in the trunk have functionally diverged between species, suggesting that transcriptional robustness is maintained, despite considerable divergence in enhancer sequences.

Indexed as

ChickensRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsChromatinEmbryonic DevelopmentEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceChromatinChromatin topologyDevelopmentEnhancersEvolutionGene regulationPlacodesTADsTeguments

Identifiers

PMID35770682
PMCPMC9307994
OpenAlexW4283759576

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.