Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35775383›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2022

Exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an appraisal through diagnosis, pathophysiology and therapy - A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association and European Association of Preventive Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

Marco Guazzi, Matthias Wilhelm, Martin Halle, Emeline Van Craenenbroeck, Hareld Kemps, Rudolph A de Boer, Andrew J S Coats, Lars Lund, Donna Mancini, Barry Borlaug and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06101693 (Biomarkers in Patients With Suspected Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06101693 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Biomarkers in Patients With Suspected Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

TypeobservationalSponsorNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,028ConditionsHeart Failure, Obesity, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionArmsPlasma biomarker levels
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CPET Characteristics in HFrEF, HFpEF and COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Marco GuazziDivision of Cardiology, University of Milano School of Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Matthias WilhelmDepartment of Cardiology Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin HalleDepartment of Prevention and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital 'Klinikum rechts der Isar', Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Emeline Van CraenenbroeckResearch Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hareld KempsDepartment of Cardiology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Rudolph A de BoerUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Andrew J S CoatsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Lars LundSolna, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Donna ManciniDepartment of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Barry BorlaugDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gerasimos FilippatosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Burkert PieskeDepartment of Cardiology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Antwerp University Hospital · BECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKarolinska Development (Sweden) · SEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance has not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, by neither European nor US groups. The current clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implications of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis of the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echocardiography and/or invasive haemodynamic evaluation. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.

Indexed as

CardiologyHeart FailureDyspneaExercise TestExercise ToleranceHumansStroke VolumeExerciseFunctional limitationGas exchange analysisHFpEF

Identifiers

PMID35775383
PMCPMC9542249
OpenAlexW4283751566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.