Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35776426›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Replication-Dependent Organization Constrains Positioning of Long DNA Repeats in Bacterial Genomes.

Nitish Malhotra, Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nitish MalhotraNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560065, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8580-9623
Aswin Sai Narain SeshasayeeNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560065, India.
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial genome organization is primarily driven by chromosomal replication from a single origin of replication. However, chromosomal rearrangements, which can disrupt such organization, are inevitable in nature. Long DNA repeats are major players mediating rearrangements, large and small, via homologous recombination. Since changes to genome organization affect bacterial fitness-and more so in fast-growing than slow-growing bacteria-and are under selection, it is reasonable to expect that genomic positioning of long DNA repeats is also under selection. To test this, we identified identical DNA repeats of at least 100 base pairs across ∼6,000 bacterial genomes and compared their distribution in fast- and slow-growing bacteria. We found that long identical DNA repeats are distributed in a non-random manner across bacterial genomes. Their distribution differs in the overall number, orientation, and proximity to the origin of replication, between fast- and slow-growing bacteria. We show that their positioning-which might arise from a combination of the processes that produce repeats and selection on rearrangements that recombination between repeat elements might cause-permits less disruption to the replication-dependent genome organization of bacteria compared with random suggesting it as a major constraint to positioning of long DNA repeats.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenome, BacterialDNADNA, BacterialGene RearrangementGenomicsDNADNA, Bacterialbacterial genomicsbioinformaticschromosomal rearrangementscomparative genomicsgenome evolutiongenome organization

Identifiers

PMID35776426
PMCPMC9297083
OpenAlexW4283762257

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.