Evidence mapPaperPMID 35779062Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2022

Translating guidelines into practice via implementation science: an update in lipidology.

Laney K Jones, Amy C Sturm, Michael R Gionfriddo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laney K JonesGenomic Medicine Institute Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amy C SturmGenomic Medicine Institute Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael R GionfriddoDivision of Pharmaceutical, Administrative and Social Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Identification Methods, Patient Activation, and Cascade Testing for FH: IMPACT-FHR01HL148246 · NHLBI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI Ana Morales Reyes · 2019 to 2026
$5.1M
Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: CARE-FHR33HL161775 · NHLBI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI Samuel S Gidding · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: CARE-FHR61HL161775 · NHLBI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI GIDDING, SAMUEL S, JONES, LANEY K · 2022 to 2022
$423k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148246NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL161775NHLBI NIH HHS R61 HL161775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGuidelines provide recommendations for clinicians based on the best available evidence and informed by clinical expertise. These recommendations often fail to be utilized by clinicians hindering the translation of evidence into practice. The purpose of this review is to describe novel ways in which implementation science has been used to improve translation of guidelines into clinical practice in the field of lipidology. RECENT

findingsWe searched PubMed for articles related to guideline implementation in lipidology published in 2021 and 2022. Identified articles were categorized into three domains: first, poor uptake of guideline recommendations in practice; second, implementation science as a solution to improve care; and third, examples of how implementation science can be incorporated into guidelines. SUMMARY: The field of lipidology has identified that many guideline recommendations fail to be translated into practice and has started to utilize methods from implementation science to assess ways to shrink this gap. Future work should focus on deploying tools from implementation science to address current gaps in guideline development. Such as, developing a systematic approach to restructure guideline recommendations so they are implementable in practice and aid in clinicians' ability to easily translate them into practice.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceHumans

Identifiers

PMID35779062
PMCPMC9640274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.