ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2022
Factors influencing pregnancy outcome with special attention to modified slow-release insemination and a patient-centred approach in a donor insemination programme: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A higher pregnancy rate after slow-release insemination instead of bolus injection was described in previous studies. Besides an effective medical treatment most patients wish to receive a patient-centred approach with sufficient emotional support. Study question: Does a patient-friendly approach with slow-release insemination (SRI) increase the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after intrauterine insemination (IUI) with donor semen? Study design, size, duration: The data of an ongoing prospective cohort study were analysed investigating the results of 1995 donor inseminations in 606 women from July 2011 until December 2018. As from January 2016 the insemination procedure was performed by midwives instead of medical doctors. Instead of bolus injection of sperm a slow-release IUI was done together with a more patient-centred approach. Materials and Methods: The data of 1995 donor inseminations were analysed to study the importance of different covariates influencing IUI success. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used for statistical analysis. Results of two periods (2011-2015 and 2016-2018) were examined and compared. Results: Clinical pregnancy rates (with foetal heartbeat) following donor inseminations increased from 16.6 % to 20.8 % per cycle, a non-significant increase (p=0.061). Conclusion: A more patient-friendly approach with slow-release of processed semen resulted in a non-significant higher clinical pregnancy rate of 4.2 % per cycle after donor insemination.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.