Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A DNA barcode reference library for endemic Ponto-Caspian amphipods.

Denis Copilaş-Ciocianu, Tomasz Rewicz, Arthur F Sands, Dmitry Palatov, Ivan Marin, Kęstutis Arbačiauskas, Paul D N Hebert, Michal Grabowski, Asta Audzijonyte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Denis Copilaş-CiocianuLaboratory of Evolutionary Ecology of Hydrobionts, Nature Research Centre, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania. denis.copilas-ciocianu@gamtc.lt.
Tomasz RewiczDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237, Lodz, Poland.
Arthur F SandsArea of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Dmitry PalatovA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Ivan MarinA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Kęstutis ArbačiauskasLaboratory of Evolutionary Ecology of Hydrobionts, Nature Research Centre, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Paul D N HebertCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Michal GrabowskiDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237, Lodz, Poland.
Asta AudzijonyteLaboratory of Evolutionary Ecology of Hydrobionts, Nature Research Centre, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Nature Research Centre · LTSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUUniversity of Łódź · PLUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ponto-Caspian region is an endemicity hotspot that harbours several crustacean radiations, among which amphipods are the most diverse. These poorly known species are severely threatened in their native range, while at the same time they are invading European inland waters with significant ecological consequences. A proper taxonomic knowledge of this fauna is paramount for its conservation within the native region and monitoring outside of it. Here, we assemble a DNA barcode reference library for nearly 60% of all known Ponto-Caspian amphipod species. We use several methods to define molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs), based on two mitochondrial markers (COI and 16S), and assess their congruence with current species-level taxonomy based on morphology. Depending on the method, we find that 54-69% of species had congruent morpho-molecular boundaries. The cases of incongruence resulted from lumping distinct morphospecies into a single MOTU (7-27%), splitting a morphospecies into several MOTUs (4-28%), or both (4-11%). MOTUs defined by distance-based methods without a priori divergence thresholds showed the highest congruence with morphological taxonomy. These results indicate that DNA barcoding is valuable for clarifying the diversity of Ponto-Caspian amphipods, but reveals that extensive work is needed to resolve taxonomic uncertainties. Our study advances the DNA barcode reference library for the European aquatic biota, paving the way towards improved taxonomic knowledge needed to enhance monitoring and conservation efforts.

Indexed as

AmphipodaButterfliesAnimalsDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGene LibraryDNA

Identifiers

PMID35790799
PMCPMC9256591
OpenAlexW4283822763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.