Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791023›Full record

GuidelineJournal of foot and ankle research2022

Australian guideline on prevention of foot ulceration: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease.

Michelle R Kaminski, Jonathan Golledge, Joel W J Lasschuit, Karl-Heinz Schott, James Charles, Jane Cheney, Anita Raspovic, Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project

Open access · goldAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle R KaminskiDiscipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. m.kaminski@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1133-4853
Jonathan GolledgeQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Joel W J LasschuitDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karl-Heinz SchottSouthern Cross University School of Health and Human Sciences / Pedorthics, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
James CharlesFirst Peoples Health Unit, Health Group, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Jane CheneyDiabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anita RaspovicDiscipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project
La Trobe University · AUDiabetes Australia · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUGriffith University · AUSouthern Cross University · AUTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

Australian Diabetes Society The Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project received in-kind secretariat support and oversightDiabetes Feet Australia The Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project received in-kind secretariat support and oversightNational Diabetes Services Scheme The Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project received part funding from the National Diabetes Services Scheme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no current Australian guidelines on the prevention of diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU). A national expert panel aimed to systematically identify and adapt suitable international guidelines to the Australian context to create new Australian evidence-based guidelines on prevention of first-ever and/or recurrent DFU. These guidelines will include for the first-time considerations for rural and remote, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

methodsThe National Health and Medical Research Council procedures were followed to adapt suitable international guidelines on DFU prevention to the Australian health context. This included a search of public databases after which the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) prevention guideline was deemed the most appropriate for adaptation. The 16 IWGDF prevention recommendations were assessed using the ADAPTE and GRADE systems to decide if they should be adopted, adapted or excluded for the new Australian guideline. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendation ratings were re-evaluated with reference to the Australian context. This guideline underwent public consultation, further revision, and approval by national peak bodies.

resultsOf the 16 original IWGDF prevention recommendations, nine were adopted, six were adapted and one was excluded. It is recommended that all people at increased risk of DFU are assessed at intervals corresponding to the IWGDF risk ratings. For those at increased risk, structured education about appropriate foot protection, inspection, footwear, weight-bearing activities, and foot self-care is recommended. Prescription of orthotic interventions and/or medical grade footwear, providing integrated foot care, and self-monitoring of foot skin temperatures (contingent on validated, user-friendly and affordable systems becoming available in Australia) may also assist in preventing DFU. If the above recommended non-surgical treatment fails, the use of various surgical interventions for the prevention of DFU can be considered.

conclusionsThis new Australian evidence-based guideline on prevention of DFU, endorsed by 10 national peak bodies, provides specific recommendations for relevant health professionals and consumers in the Australian context to prevent DFU. Following these recommendations should achieve better DFU prevention outcomes in Australia.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootFoot UlcerAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesFootHumansPopulation GroupsDiabetes-related foot diseaseDiabetes-related foot ulcerationEducationFoot self-careFoot ulcerFootwearGuidelinePreventionSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35791023
PMCPMC9258081
OpenAlexW4284678865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.