Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794366›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Effect of Surgical Humidification on Inflammation and Peritoneal Trauma in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shienny Sampurno, Timothy Chittleborough, Meara Dean, Michael Flood, Sandra Carpinteri, Sara Roth, Rosemary M Millen, Helen Cain, Joseph C H Kong, John MacKay and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shienny SampurnoSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy ChittleboroughSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Meara DeanSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael FloodSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sandra CarpinteriSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sara RothSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rosemary M MillenSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Helen CainSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joseph C H KongSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John MacKayEpworth Healthcare, Richmond Victoria, Richmond, Australia.
Satish K WarrierSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacob McCormickSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathon G HillerSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander G HeriotSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert G RamsaySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. rob.ramsay@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-0433
Andrew C LynchEpworth Healthcare, Richmond Victoria, Richmond, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUEpworth Hospital · AU

Funding

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare APP1156391Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Research and engineering supportNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia APP1156391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-clinical studies indicate that dry-cold-carbon-dioxide (DC-CO2) insufflation leads to more peritoneal damage, inflammation and hypothermia compared with humidified-warm-CO

methodsSixty-six patients were randomized into laparoscopic groups; those insufflated with DC-CO2 or HW-CO2. A separate group of nineteen patients undergoing laparotomy were randomised to conventional surgery or with the insertion of a device delivering HW-CO2. Temperatures were monitored and peritoneal biopsies and bloods were taken at the start of surgery, at 1 and 3 h. Further bloods were taken depending upon hospital length-of-stay (LOS). Peritoneal samples were subjected to scanning electron microscopy to evaluate mesothelial damage.

resultsLaparoscopic cases experienced a temperature drop despite Bair-Hugger

conclusionsThis prospective RCT is in accord with animal studies while highlighting pre-existing damage in some patients. Peritoneal mesothelium protection, reduced inflammation and restoration of core-body temperature data suggest benefit with the use of HW-CO2 in patients undergoing CRC surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsInsufflationLaparoscopyAnimalsCarbonCarbon DioxideC-Reactive ProteinHumansHumidityInflammationPeritoneumProspective StudiesCarbonCarbon DioxideC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID35794366
PMCPMC9261208
OpenAlexW4284885201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.