ReviewEClinicalMedicine2022
Myocardial regeneration protocols towards the routine clinical scenario: An unseemly path from bench to bedside.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiac Function in Mouse Models of Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An overview on cardiac regeneration revolution: exploring the promise of stem cell therapies.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Inhibition of circALPK2 enhances proliferation and therapeutic potential of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in myocardial infarction.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Targeting the redox system for cardiovascular regeneration in aging.Aging cell · 2023Review
- Science Is a Self-Correcting Discipline: Revisiting the Biological Potential of Adult Cardiac Progenitors.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023Article
- Statins and Cardiomyocyte Metabolism, Friend or Foe?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Mechanisms regulating vascular and lymphatic regeneration in the heart after myocardial infarction.The Journal of pathology · 2023Review
- Article
- Establishment of a protocol to administer immunosuppressive drugs for iPS cell-derived cardiomyocyte patch transplantation in a rat myocardial infarction model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Polarizing Macrophage Functional Phenotype to Foster Cardiac Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification of hub genes and potential ceRNA networks of diabetic cardiomyopathy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Mouse Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Produced by Isoproterenol Acute Exposure Followed by 5-Fluorouracil Administration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Tricuspid Valve Development and Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Streptozotocin-Induced Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus Mouse Models Show Different Functional, Cellular and Molecular Patterns of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Stem Cell-Based Therapy and Cell-Free Therapy as an Alternative Approach for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2023Review
- Activation of Nrf2 signaling: A key molecular mechanism of protection against cardiovascular diseases by natural products.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure secondary to cardiomyocyte loss and/or dysfunction is the number one killer worldwide. The field of myocardial regeneration with its far-reaching primary goal of cardiac remuscularization and its hard-to-accomplish translation from bench to bedside, has been filled with ups and downs, steps forward and steps backward, controversies galore and, unfortunately, scientific scandals. Despite the present morass in which cardiac remuscularization is stuck in, the search for clinically effective regenerative approaches remains keenly active. Starting with a concise overview of the still highly debated regenerative capacity of the adult mammalian heart, we focus on the main interventions, that have reached or are close to clinical use, critically discussing key findings, successes, and failures. Finally, some promising and innovative approaches for myocardial repair/regeneration still at the pre-clinical stage are discussed to offer a holistic view on the future of myocardial repair/regeneration for the prevention/management of heart failure in the clinical scenario. Funding: This research was funded by Grants from the Ministry of University and Research PRIN2015 2015ZTT5KB_004; PRIN2017NKB2N4_005; PON-AIM - 1829805-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.