ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Comparison of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after primary PCI in patients receiving high-dose rosuvastatin and atorvastatin.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inappropriate GFR equations misrepresent CKD epidemiology and risk interpretation in scientific reports.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy of High-Dose Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin in Preventing Cystatin C-Oriented Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: RACCOON-AMI Registry.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased disability and death. Randomized clinical trial studies have shown that short-term treatment with statins prior to cardiac intervention was capable of reducing the incidence of CIN. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of CIN after primary PCI in patients receiving high-dose rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. Methods: This clinical trial was performed in Mazandaran Heart Center Hospital on patients referred to the emergency department who underwent primary PCI with a diagnosis of STEMI. Patients received 1 cc/kg/h normal saline from PCI for up to 12 hours. Patients with EF less than or equal to 35% received intravenous normal saline at half the usual dose. SPSS software version 24 was used for data analysis. Results: 206 patients were included in the study that the most underlying diseases of patients (79, 38.3%) were hypertension, followed by anemia (76, 36.9%) and diabetes mellitus (52, 25.2%). Among these, in the first criterion, 10 (8.1%) and 4 patients (4.8%) were in the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups, respectively, which did not have a statistically significant difference (P = 0.264). Examination of GFR subgroups also showed that GFR above 30 had significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of different statins has had similar results in the prevention of CIN in patients undergoing primary PCI. Rosuvastatin has no special advantage over atorvastatin, showing that the use of any of these drugs can be useful in patients requiring angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.