Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35806337›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Next-Generation Grade and Survival Expression Biomarkers of Human Gliomas Based on Algorithmically Reconstructed Molecular Pathways.

Marianna A Zolotovskaia, Max A Kovalenko, Victor S Tkachev, Alexander M Simonov, Maxim I Sorokin, Ella Kim, Denis V Kuzmin, Betul Karademir-Yilmaz, Anton A Buzdin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Marianna A ZolotovskaiaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-2156
Max A KovalenkoMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8987-1889
Victor S TkachevOmicsway Corp., Walnut, CA 91789, USA.
Alexander M SimonovMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Maxim I SorokinMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-3446
Ella KimClinic for Neurosurgery, Laboratory of Experimental Neurooncology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Centre, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55124 Mainz, Germany.
Denis V KuzminMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Betul Karademir-YilmazDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine/Genetic and Metabolic Diseases Research and Investigation Center (GEMHAM), Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-0284
Anton A BuzdinShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMarmara University · TRSechenov University · RU

Funding

ERA-NET RUS Plus Program GOTICS ProjectRussian Foundation for Basic Research 20-515-76007Turkish Foundation for TUBITAK 120N087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gliomas, expression of certain marker genes is strongly associated with survival and tumor type and often exceeds histological assessments. Using a human interactome model, we algorithmically reconstructed 7494 new-type molecular pathways that are centered each on an individual protein. Each single-gene expression and gene-centric pathway activation was tested as a survival and tumor grade biomarker in gliomas and their diagnostic subgroups (IDH mutant or wild type, IDH mutant with 1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylated or unmethylated), including the three major molecular subtypes of glioblastoma (proneural, mesenchymal, classical). We used three datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas, which in total include 527 glioblastoma and 1097 low grade glioma profiles. We identified 2724 such gene and 2418 pathway survival biomarkers out of total 17,717 genes and 7494 pathways analyzed. We then assessed tumor grade and molecular subtype biomarkers and with the threshold of AUC > 0.7 identified 1322/982 gene biomarkers and 472/537 pathway biomarkers. This suggests roughly two times greater efficacy of the reconstructed pathway approach compared to gene biomarkers. Thus, we conclude that activation levels of algorithmically reconstructed gene-centric pathways are a potent class of new-generation diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaBiomarkers, TumorHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationBiomarkers, TumorIsocitrate Dehydrogenasegene expressionglioblastomahuman gliomasinteractome-assisted algorithmslow grade gliomasmolecular pathway analysisRNA sequencingsurvival and prognosis biomarkerssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35806337
PMCPMC9266372
OpenAlexW4283745649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.