Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35807854›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Effect of Different Nutritional Supplements on Glucose Response of Complete Meals in Two Crossover Studies.

Nele Gheldof, Celia Francey, Andreas Rytz, Léonie Egli, Frederik Delodder, Lionel Bovetto, Nathalie Piccardi, Christian Darimont

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Manipulation of Post-Prandial Hyperglycaemia in Type 2 Diabetes: An Update for Practitioners.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nele GheldofNestlé Research, Institute of Health Sciences, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-7372
Celia FranceyNestlé Research, Institute of Health Sciences, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andreas RytzNestlé Research, Clinical Research Unit, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5992-9154
Léonie EgliNestlé Research, Institute of Health Sciences, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Frederik DelodderNestlé Research, Clinical Research Unit, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lionel BovettoNestlé Research, Institute of Material Science, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nathalie PiccardiNestlé Research, Clinical Research Unit, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian DarimontNestlé Research, Institute of Health Sciences, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nestlé (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postprandial hyperglycemia is an important risk factor in the development and progression of type-2 diabetes and cardiometabolic diseases. Therefore, maintaining a low postprandial glucose response is key in preventing these diseases. Carbohydrate-rich meals are the main drivers of excessive glycemic excursions during the day. The consumption of whey protein premeals or mulberry leaf extract was reported to reduce postprandial glycemia through different mechanisms of action. The efficacy of these interventions was shown to be affected by the timing of the consumption or product characteristics. Two randomised crossover studies were performed, aiming to identify the optimal conditions to improve the efficacy of these nutritional supplements in reducing a glycemic response. The acute postprandial glycemic response was monitored with a continuous glucose monitoring device. The first study revealed that a preparation featuring 10 g of whey protein microgel reduced the postprandial glucose response by up to 30% (p = 0.001) and was more efficient than the whey protein isolates, independently of whether the preparation was ingested 30 or 10 min before a complete 320 kcal breakfast. The second study revealed that a preparation featuring 250 mg mulberry leaf extract was more efficient if it was taken together with a complete 510 kcal meal (−34%, p < 0.001) rather than ingested 5 min before (−26%, p = 0.002). These findings demonstrate that the efficacy of whey proteins premeal and mulberry leaf extracts can be optimised to provide potential nutritional solutions to lower the risk of type-2 diabetes or its complications.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MorusBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCross-Over StudiesGlucoseHumansInsulinMealsPlant ExtractsPostprandial PeriodWhey ProteinsBlood GlucoseGlucoseInsulinPlant ExtractsWhey Proteinsblood glucosediabetes mellitusglycemic responsemulberry (Morus alba) leaf extractwhey protein

Identifiers

PMID35807854
PMCPMC9268658
OpenAlexW4284989385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.