Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810294›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Supporting and enabling health research in a local authority (SERLA): an exploratory study.

Ciara E McGee, Megan Barlow-Pay, Ivaylo Vassilev, Janis Baird, Lee-Ann Fenge, Debbie Chase, Julie Parkes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ciara E McGeeNational Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network Wessex, Southampton, UK. ciara.mcgee@nihr.ac.uk.
Megan Barlow-PayNational Institute for Health Research, Research Design Service South Central, Southampton, UK.
Ivaylo VassilevHealth Sciences, Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Janis BairdMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lee-Ann FengeFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Debbie ChasePublic Health, Southampton City Council, UK.
Julie ParkesSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Jules@soton.ac.uk.
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBBournemouth University · GBSouthampton City Council · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of research evidence to underpin public health practice and policy decisions in local government is strongly promoted but its implementation has not been straightforward. This study aimed to explore the factors, relationships and processes that contribute towards accessing, using, and generating research evidence that is relevant to local authority public health and social care and shapes its practice.

methodsSemi-structured individual interviews with elected councillors, officers directly involved with public health and social care and with community members from one urban unitary authority in South England were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

resultsFourteen participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Local knowledge and evidence are prioritised, and anecdotal evidence is valued. The Director of Public Health was the principal source of information and support. Academics were rarely mentioned as information sources, and their involvement was ad hoc. The use of research evidence varied between individuals and departments, with wider engagement among public health specialists. Key barriers to the use of research evidence included access (not reported among public health professionals), research timeliness, local applicability, competence in finding and interpreting evidence and the role of research evidence within a political context. Public health and adult social care teams are not currently research active or research ready. Major barriers exist due to financial constraints and the socio-political context of local authorities. COVID-19 disrupted siloed ways of working, strengthening and opening potential collaborations within the local authority. This changed perspectives about the value of research but is likely time-limited unless underpinned by sustainable funding.

conclusionCreating strategic level roles within local government to work with the Director of Public Health to champion the research agenda and embedding researchers within and across teams would build capacity for local authorities to sustainably co-create, undertake, and use evidence to better inform future actions.

Indexed as

COVID-19State MedicineAdultHumansLocal GovernmentPublic Health AdministrationPublic Health PracticeLocal authorityPublic healthResearch

Identifiers

PMID35810294
PMCPMC9270788
OpenAlexW4284988880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.