ArticlePeerJ2022
Amino acids profiling and transcriptomic data integration demonstrates the dynamic regulation of amino acids synthesis in the leaves of
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolite Profiling and Antimicrobial Activities ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization of the Difference between Day and Night Temperatures on the Growth, Photosynthesis, and Metabolite Accumulation of Tea Seedlings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genome-wide identification and analysis of bZIP gene family reveal their roles during development and drought stress in Wheel Wingnut (Cyclocarya paliurus).BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Multi-omics analyses reveal new insights into nutritional quality changes of alfalfa leaves during the flowering period.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis was employed to investigate the changes in the amino acid profile over several developmental stages (S1, the smallest fully expanded leaf; S3, full leaf enlargement and full leaf thickness; and S2, an intermediate developmental stage between S1 and S3) and the molecular mechanism was elucidated. Results: The results showed that leaves at the S1 stage had the highest content, while those at the S3 stage had the lowest content of amino acids; fourteen differentially expressed genes were involved in the glycolysis pathway, the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the pentose phosphate pathway, which indicated that the reduced abundance of amino acids in the leaves of Conclusions: Leaves at the S1 stage are recommended for high quality tea production because of their high content of amino acids, while leaves at the S2 stage are recommended for generous tea production because of their high levels of sweet flavor amino acids (alanine) and essential amino acids (methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, and tryptophan).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.