Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812156›Full record

SynthesisTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2022

Using Information Available at the Time of Donor Offer to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models.

Stephanie Riley, Qing Zhang, Wai-Yee Tse, Andrew Connor, Yinghui Wei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie RileyCentre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Qing ZhangCentre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Wai-Yee TseDepartment of Renal Medicine, South West Transplant Centre, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Andrew ConnorDepartment of Renal Medicine, South West Transplant Centre, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Yinghui WeiCentre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical models that can predict graft and patient survival outcomes following kidney transplantation could be of great clinical utility. We sought to appraise existing clinical prediction models for kidney transplant survival outcomes that could guide kidney donor acceptance decision-making. We searched for clinical prediction models for survival outcomes in adult recipients with single kidney-only transplants. Models that require information anticipated to become available only after the time of transplantation were excluded as, by that time, the kidney donor acceptance decision would have already been made. The outcomes of interest were all-cause and death-censored graft failure, and death. We summarised the methodological characteristics of the prediction models, predictive performance and risk of bias. We retrieved 4,026 citations from which 23 articles describing 74 models met the inclusion criteria. Discrimination was moderate for all-cause graft failure (C-statistic: 0.570-0.652; Harrell's C: 0.580-0.660; AUC: 0.530-0.742), death-censored graft failure (C-statistic: 0.540-0.660; Harrell's C: 0.590-0.700; AUC: 0.450-0.810) and death (C-statistic: 0.637-0.770; Harrell's C: 0.570-0.735). Calibration was seldom reported. Risk of bias was high in 49 of the 74 models, primarily due to methods for handling missing data. The currently available prediction models using pre-transplantation information show moderate discrimination and varied calibration. Further model development is needed to improve predictions for the purpose of clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdultClinical Decision-MakingGraft SurvivalHumansModels, StatisticalTissue Donorsclinical prediction modeldecision-makingkidney transplantationkidney transplant outcomesprediction toolprognosissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35812156
PMCPMC9259750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.