SynthesisTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2022
Using Information Available at the Time of Donor Offer to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Prediction Models.
Synthesis in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting first-year kidney graft loss at the time of donor offer using machine learning and competing-risk analysis in a Latin American cohort.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Predicting 2-Year Early Allograft Failure After Kidney Transplant: A Perioperative Risk Model from the MOVER Cohort.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Maximum cold ischemia duration for a kidney allograft: a prediction model for allograft failure at the time of organ allocation.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- International validation of a pre-transplant risk assessment tool for graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Impact of device variability and protocol differences on kidney function during normothermic machine perfusion: A comparative study using porcine and human kidneys.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- The effectiveness, equity and explainability of health service resource allocation-with applications in kidney transplantation & family planning.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Predicting offer burden to optimize batch sizes in simultaneously expiring kidney offers.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Predicting kidney graft function and failure among kidney transplant recipients.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Preoperative Risk Assessment of Early Kidney Graft Loss.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- An external validation of the Kidney Donor Risk Index in the UK transplant population in the presence of semi-competing events.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2023Article
- A pre-transplantation risk assessment tool for graft survival in Dutch pediatric kidney recipients.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statistical models that can predict graft and patient survival outcomes following kidney transplantation could be of great clinical utility. We sought to appraise existing clinical prediction models for kidney transplant survival outcomes that could guide kidney donor acceptance decision-making. We searched for clinical prediction models for survival outcomes in adult recipients with single kidney-only transplants. Models that require information anticipated to become available only after the time of transplantation were excluded as, by that time, the kidney donor acceptance decision would have already been made. The outcomes of interest were all-cause and death-censored graft failure, and death. We summarised the methodological characteristics of the prediction models, predictive performance and risk of bias. We retrieved 4,026 citations from which 23 articles describing 74 models met the inclusion criteria. Discrimination was moderate for all-cause graft failure (C-statistic: 0.570-0.652; Harrell's C: 0.580-0.660; AUC: 0.530-0.742), death-censored graft failure (C-statistic: 0.540-0.660; Harrell's C: 0.590-0.700; AUC: 0.450-0.810) and death (C-statistic: 0.637-0.770; Harrell's C: 0.570-0.735). Calibration was seldom reported. Risk of bias was high in 49 of the 74 models, primarily due to methods for handling missing data. The currently available prediction models using pre-transplantation information show moderate discrimination and varied calibration. Further model development is needed to improve predictions for the purpose of clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.