ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by multi-omics analysis and an integrated model.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- TFP12 as a key regulator of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Article
- Is it time to retire sentinel lymph node biopsy and use multi-omics prediction models?Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To avoid unnecessary postoperative complications, it is essential to select breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis who might be eligible for exemption from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, the lymph node metastasis (LNM) of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is difficult to predict if only considering clinical parameters. Hence, by investigating the difference between LN positive and LN negative patients, we aimed to build a multi-omics model able to better predict LNM in TNBC. Methods: A total of 445 TNBC patients with lymph node status and multi-omics data were enrolled and divided into training and validation sets. We analyzed both clinicopathological characteristics and multi-omics data to search for robust biomarkers, which were used to establish a multi-omics model. Results: Compared with LN negative patients, LN positive patients had an increasing number of mutational events, while the frequencies of both amplification and deletion in somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) were lower in LN positive cases. After analyzing upregulated gene-related pathways, neutrophil-related pathways were found to be enriched in LN positive patients. Based on these omics analyses, 5 predictors were utilized to build a multi-omics model, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.790 in the training set and 0.807 in the validation set, showing a better performance than models using individual omics data. Conclusions: After analyzing the largest TNBC multi-omics cohorts, we identified the potential clinical and molecular characteristics that are related to LNM. A multi-omics model was developed and performed robustly in predicting LNM, with the potential assistance of tailoring unnecessary axillary LN management among TNBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.